Organize!

The greatest value of the game, for me, is the 24 issue cards. I see incredible content development behind them, as selecting and briefly elaborating on 24 important social issues is no small feat. Alongside the description of the issues, a goal is also articulated for each one. You can fight for better working conditions and higher wages at canneries, for the creation of dog parks, for increased support for family members who provide home care, for the resignation of a harassing director, for the marriage rights of same-sex couples, and much more.

To achieve our goals, the game gives us power. There are four types of power cards: Community, Media and Public Opinion, Democratic Institutions, Allies. Let's look at an example for each. Community: neighbors; Media and Public Opinion: national television; Democratic Institutions: European Union institution; Allies: police.

The gameplay is very simple; we achieve our goals by playing power cards. Each round, we draw an issue card, determine the citizen group we are playing as, and then play power cards in turn. The latter is essentially a storytelling game element, as we need to interpret the specific card in the reality of the issue and narrate an event or a story within the context. For example, how we involve the neighbors in advocating for the establishment of a dog park in the neighborhood.

The question of having a game master is always delicate. I fundamentally dislike games that can only be played with a game master. First, because it's not a good role: someone is left out of the game. Second, it may require knowledge that is not available everywhere. I was concerned about this latter point, but the section of the rulebook that discusses the preparation of the game master reassured me that it is a surmountable task. Probably, the added value is greater if we can acquire an expert in a specific topic to serve as the game master, but testing the game showed that it is possible to delve into the topics even without one.

And essentially, that's the point of this game. To highlight issues and connect them with characters, thereby creating a context in which we can collectively think about social issues. The game does not offer solutions, but it encourages thought, which can lead to action. It seems to me that the game has taken this on itself and fulfills it. The game elements—storytelling, the luck factor with dice rolls, and recording different levels of scoring—are supplements and supports for collective thinking and discussions about important matters.