Reading Development + Games

Board Game + Education

Board Games

Knowledge about your own game

Knowledge about your own game

Knowledge about your own game

Jan 8, 2025

Jan 8, 2025

Máté Lencse

Máté Lencse

Recently, during a game, one of the players got quite frustrated because I won, and they didn’t anticipate one of my moves. However, his wife—who I play with significantly more often—reassured him, saying, “Máté plays board games completely differently than others.” This comment stayed with me for a few days, and I thought about it a lot. Eventually, I decided to ask her exactly what she meant by it.

Apparently, I try out multiple strategies and easily switch between them even within a single game. I’m happy to take risks and don’t care much for playing it safe, all while it’s unclear whether I’m calculating or just going by instinct. Sometimes, I’ll explore a path purely out of curiosity, just to see if it works.

I’m a competitive type, so when I first discovered modern board games and started playing a lot, winning became very important to me. But as I got to know the board gaming world—especially after I started designing games myself—that focus somehow faded. I’m still interested in winning, and I clearly play to win, but my enjoyment of the game isn’t defined by whether I manage to secure a victory. Sometimes, I’m so captivated by a particular mechanical solution that I lose sight of the big picture and end up losing entirely.

I almost never calculate; I enjoy making decisions based on intuition. Because of this, I don’t spend much time thinking—I prefer to keep the game moving to see how things unfold. A few years ago, when József Jesztl and I were writing a book and reflecting on how players develop through gameplay, we found that understanding your own playstyle is a field where the levels of progression can be well described. Here’s how we articulated those levels:

  1. There is no need or inclination to reflect on one’s own gameplay.

  2. Emotional evaluation of the game emerges: “good game” or “bad game.”

  3. Simplistic assessments appear, capturing basic qualities of actions: “I played well” or “I played poorly.”

  4. Accurately and thoroughly analyzes their own gameplay.

  5. Accurately and thoroughly analyzes their own gameplay and uses the insights gained during the same game.

  6. As a player, they are capable of a complex analysis of the game, considering their own strengths and weaknesses.

How much do you reflect on your own gameplay?